Harris v. Grayson’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 1930
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schrimpscher v. Stockton · Patterson v. Rousney · Maine v. Edmonds · Davis v. Foley · McNeil v. Garland & Nash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person or persons, or their heirs, shall have, sue or maintain any action or suit, either in law or equity, for any lands, tenements or hereditaments but within seven years next after his, her or their right to commence, have or maintain such suit shall have come, fallen or accrued; and all suits, either in law or equity, for the recovery of any lands, tenements or hereditaments shall be had and sued within seven years next after title or causé of action accrued, and no time after said seven years shall have passed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grayson v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.