Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 Or. 100

276 P 277

Maizels v. Kozer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1929

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1929-04-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1975

3 state decisions

Relies on Williams v. Henry

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PEE OUEIAM.

¶1 This case arose in a controversy between two merchants over a trademark. The Hon. Sam A. Kozer, then Secretary of State, directed a cancellation of plaintiff’s trademark because, in his opinion, it was an infringement of a trademark to which A. Yolchok, the other merchant, was entitled. Plaintiff sued out a writ of review. The writ was not served on the opposing party to the proceeding before the Secretary of State, to wit: A. Yolchok. For this reason the Circuit Court was without juris *101 diction to entertain the case: Or. L., § 609; Williams v. Henry, 70 Or. 466, 468 (142 Pac. 337).

¶2 The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and proceedings dismissed. Reversed and Dismissed.

/129/or/100 · .json · Public domain