Neill v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] conviction based on an indictment that was issued by fewer than seven jurors is not void and, therefore, does not constitute a basis for post-conviction relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“had an opportunity to review the petition and to seek amendments to the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.