Simpson v. Murkowski’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2022
2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Flemming v. Nestor · United States Trust Company of New York v. New Jersey · United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz · Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus · Richardson v. Belcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the plain meaning and purpose of the provision and the intent of the framers.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“primary difference between promissory and equitable estoppels is that the former is offensive, and can be used for affirmative enforcement of a promise, whereas the latter is defensive, and can be used only for preventing the opposing party from raising a particular claim or defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] superior court's order must contain specific findings of fact and conclusions of law to permit meaningful review by this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schmidt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.