Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 So. 3d 1235 - State v. Tassin

129 So. 3d 1235 - State v. Tassin’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Berger v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the touchstone of due process analysis in cases of alleged prosecutorial misconduct is the fairness of the trial, not the culpability of the prosecutor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Prosecutorial misconduct must be so pronounced and persistent that it casts serious doubts upon the correctness of the jury's verdict. The reviewing court should accord credit to the good sense and fair-mindedness of the jury that heard the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to qualify to serve as a juror, a person must:...Not be under indictment for a felony nor have been convicted of a felony for which he has not been pardoned by the governor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.