Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 SW3D 13 - State v. Nunnery

State v. Nunnery’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · McNeil v. Wisconsin · Arizona v. Roberson · Foss v. Foss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The state’s showing that a ‘defendant was informed of his rights, that he was capable of understanding those rights, and that no physical force, threats, promises or coercive tactics were used to obtain the confession,’ is prima facie evidence that the confession given while the defendant was in custody was voluntary.” State v. Johnson, 988 S.W.2d 115, 120 (Mo.App.1999) (quoting State v. Wilkinson, 861 S.W.2d 746, 750 (Mo.App.1993)). “After the state has made a prima facie case, the defendant must produce evidence showing any ‘special circumstance’ that may have rendered the confession involuntary.” State v. Day, 970 S.W.2d 406, 409 (MoApp. 1998). Appellant presented no such evidence. We find that the State met its burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.