Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 S.W.3d 399

Crockett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2004

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2004-02-17

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2020

3 state decisions

20200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2Rodney Crockett appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his convictions for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute and drug trafficking in the second degree. In his motion for postconviction relief, Crockett charged his attorney with ineffective assistance for failing to call an alibi witness. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. We affirm the circuit court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/129/sw3d/399 · .json · Public domain