Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 S.W.3d 429

State v. Bolden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2004-03-16

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2014

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Kevin Bolden (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of sale of a controlled substance, cocaine base, in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo 2000. The trial court found Defendant to be a prior and persistent offender, subject to an extended term of imprisonment, and sentenced Defendant to fifteen years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. We affirm.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/129/sw3d/429 · .json · Public domain