Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 S.W.3d 696 - Nhem v. State

Nhem v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 23rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Moody v. State · Johnson v. State · Martin v. State · Swearingen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a possession with intent to deliver case, the State must prove that the defendant: (1) exercised care, custody, control, or management over the controlled substance; (2) intended to deliver the controlled substance to another; and (3) knew that the substance in his possession was a controlled substance.”). Thus, Hernandez”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.