Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
39 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · Commonwealth v. Jarman · Commonwealth v. Modaffare · Bagheri v. State · Commonwealth v. Loeper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“couldn't do [the field sobriety tests] sober,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kirsch v. State · Kirsch v. State“not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“because of the peculiar posture of this appeal, [Stewart] does not resolve the problem that faces trial courts: whether to admit breath-test results without extrapolation evidence. This appeal presents only half of the problem, relevancy.... [Tjhere are serious issues about the other half, weighing the relevancy value against possibly unfair prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McGowan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.