Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 TENN 560 - State v. Ragghianti

State v. Ragghianti’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2002

5 state decisions

201914192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Unless an injunction order is void upon its face for lack of jurisdiction on the part of the judge who granted it, it must be obeyed, however erroneous the granting of it may have been, until it is dissolved on motion or appeal or some other method of direct review in the action in which it was granted.’ 1 Joyce on Injunctions, sec. 247” (italics onrs). [ 129 Tenn. 560 , 167 S. W. 690 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.