Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 TEX 211 - Upson v. Fitzgerald

Upson v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably Kirk v. Beard (1961), Dallas County Community College District v. Bolton (2005)

4 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

12019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hooks v. Bridgewater · Canada v. Ihmsen · Hale v. Hale · Bumpass v. Johnson · Stevens v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “since the value of the consideration may be recovered in an action at law on a quantum meruit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.