Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 Tex. 563 - Lowrimore v. Sanders

Lowrimore v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Motsenbocker v. Wyatt (1963), Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Muswick Cigar & Beverage Co. (1959)

33 state decisions

140193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International & Great Northern Railroad v. Goswick · 37 Tex. Civ. App. 241 - Lewis v. Commercial National Bank · International G. N. R. Co. v. Davison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plaintiff’s claim for damages is based upon the defendant’s negligence ; one of the defendant’s defenses is the claim of contributory negligence of plaintiff, based in. part upon the above acts of the plaintiff. A new and independent cause could not arise out of an affirmative act of negligence by one of these parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This bill with the annexed qualification was accepted as true and correct by counsel for defendant in the trial-court and by them filed. That defendant is, therefore bound by same has been too ofttimes decided to need any discussion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.