Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

129 Tex. Crim. 90

83 S.W.2d 963

Dunn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1935-05-22

<p>The opinion states the case.</p>

Decided 1935-05-22

¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

¶2 The identity of the appellant as the offender is regarded as being clearly shown, not only by the accomplice witness, but by many corroborating circumstances.

¶3 The motion is overruled.

¶4 Overruled.

/129/texcrim/90 · .json · Public domain