Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 Vt. 124 - State v. Bruley

State v. Bruley’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2011

15 state decisions

8019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Coleman v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Thus the court in imposing sentence could fix a maximum term and also specify a shorter minimum. In the alternative, it could establish the maximum time for confinement without reference to a lesser time. But, as we have seen, insofar as the order sought to sentence the respondent to a term of not less than nine months, it was without force and effect.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Bruley, 129 Vt. 124 , 274 A.2d 467, 471 (1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a sentence with the same maximum and minimum terms of confinement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.