In Re Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2004
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robb v. Connolly · Stallings v. Splain · Cook v. Hart · Macomber v. Hudspeth · B. B. Chemical Co. v. Ellis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that a prisoner has no right to a writ of habeas corpus unless he is entitled to immediate release, and the writ will not issue unless he is presently restrained of his liberty without warrant of law. Macomber v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 115 F.2d 114 , cert. denied. 313 U.S. 558 , 61 S.Ct. 833 , 85 L.Ed. 1519 . 39 C.J.S. Habeas Corpus § 13, p. 443. “The fact that the Governor’s arrest warrant was issued more than 30 days after accused’s original arrest as fugitive from justice did not vitiate the executive warrant. [Citations omitted.] The issuance of the Governor’s warrant, and the detention of the plaintiff by virtue of his arrest under such warrant, was not made defective by a possible illegality in his previous detention beyond the statutory time under his arrest on the fugitive from justice warrant.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Hval · Alkerton v. Wingenbach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.