State v. Bolar’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 89 Wash. 2d 592 - Childers v. Childers · 127 Wash. 2d 281 - State v. McCraw · 120 Wash. 2d 203 - First Covenant Church of Seattle v. City of Seattle · 121 Wash. 2d 80 - In Re Juveniles A, B, C, D, E · State v. Tiffany
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Webster's Third New International Dictionary 2069 (3d ed.1986). In short, RCW 9.94A.360(6)(a) directed the sentencing court to count offenses for which multiple sentences are served concurrently as one offense or”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bolar“`not shared with another,' `individual,' `single,' `existing by itself,' `independent,' `distinct,' and `different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in criminal statute); 1A Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 21.14 n. 1 (5th ed.1992). The word”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bolar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.