Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 WASH2D 61 - State v. Hendrickson

State v. Hendrickson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

142 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Hendrickson (1996), State v. Ladson (1999)

142 state decisions

1070199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`jealously and carefully drawn' exceptions”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]eficient performance is not shown by matters that go to trial strategy or tactics.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the trial would have been different.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.