State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Woodson v. North Carolina · Lankford v. Idaho · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Due process in sentencing requires only adequate notice of the possibility of the death penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Finch“we do not extend such constitutional notice to the penalty exacted for conviction of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crawford“[i]t is not disputed the notice was received by counsel for Clark within the statutory period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.