Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 WASHAPP 761 - State v. Rooth

State v. Rooth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “went around the left side of vehicles in front of him. 1 Report of Proceedings (RP) at 25. That action caused the driver's side wheel and the driver's side back wheel to hit the dirt, and the vehicle started to fishtail, nearly losing control. ¶ 13 Officer Kenyon further testified that the van was never out of his sight. He stated that he observed the van driving recklessly through traffic and making erratic lane changes. The van did not make careful or safe lane changes and would drive onto the shoulder and then back into the lanes. The officer described Rooth's driving as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To convict the defendant of the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Firearm in the First Degree as charged in Count Two, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That on or about the 9th day of July, 2003, the defendant knowingly had a firearm, to-wit: a 9 mm semi-automatic pistol, in his possession or control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To convict the defendant of the crime of Unlawful Possession of a Firearm in the First Degree as charged in Count One, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That on or about the 9th day of July, 2003, the defendant knowingly had a firearm, to-wit: a .22 caliber revolver in his possession or control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.