Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 129 Wis. 2d 394 - State v. Edelburg

129 Wis. 2d 394 - State v. Edelburg’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Allen v. United States · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · Bradley v. State · 51 Wis. 2d 641 - Kelley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All jury trials involve the possibility of a juror agreeing to a majority viewpoint for reasons extraneous to the facts of the case. Merely telling a juror that her jury duties are primary does not assure that the juror will not agree to a verdict out of personal concerns. The trial judge could do nothing about the business commitment, nor the juror's private reaction to the commitment. No one can know whether a juror has compromised his or her oath unless the juror reveals that fact. Here, the judge did what he could — he gave an extra hour for deliberation. We conclude that there was no coercion sufficient to deny Edelburg a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[flailure to object to an error at trial generally precludes a defendant from raising the issue on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The waiver doctrine applies even to the claim of a constitutional right”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.