Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 A.3d 607 - Neufville v. State

Neufville v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Padilla v. Kentucky · Heath v. Vose · Powers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'When evaluating a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in a plea situation, the defendant must demonstrate a reasonable probability that but for counsel's errors, he or she would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial' and, importantly, that the outcome of the trial would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the law is not succinct and straightforward . . ., a criminal defense attorney need do no more than advise a noncitizen client that pending criminal charges may carry a risk of adverse immigration consequences. But when the deportation consequence is truly clear,. . . the duty to give correct advice is equally clear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.