Colon v. Lisk’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1998
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lawton v. Steele · Stuart v. . Palmer · Bertholf v. . O'Reilly · Lawton v. . Steele · Kane v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a proceeding is authorized which may result in a judgment that operates upon the property of the individual, either by way of forfeiture or by means of execution, the uniform rule of law has always been that, before such judgment can pass, the individual is entitled to a jury trial, unless he waives the same.” . . . [State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring Car, supra, 120 Or. at 260 , 251 P. at 703 , quoting from Colon v. Lisk, 13 App.Div. 195, 204 , 43 N.Y.S. 364, 370 (1897).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.