Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Ala. 388

Harris v. Collins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1848

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1848-01-15

Error from the Circuit Court of Mobile. Before the Hon. J. Bragg. Action of debt by plaintiff, as assignee in bankruptcy, upon a lease reserving a certain money rent due by instalments in 1839 and 1840, made by defendants to one John Tarleton, who was duly declared a bankrupt in June, 1842, and who then turned over said lease to his assignee, the plaintiff in error. The suit was commenced 17th November, 1045.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1848-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1917

2 state decisions

2018481850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CHILTON, J.

¶1The suit by the plaintiff, as assignee in bankruptcy, was commenced too late. By the 8th section of the bankrupt act, it is provided “ that no suit, at law or in equity, shall in any case be maintainable, by or against such assignee,' or by or against any person claiming an adverse interest, touching the property or rights of property aforesaid, in any court whatsoever, unless the same shall be brought within two years after the declaration and decree in bankruptcy, or after the cause of suit shall first have accrued.” The *390plaintiff in error has not brought himself within the provisions of this act. He derives his right to sue, alone from the act which vests in him the legal title for the benefit of the bankrupt’s creditors, from the time of the declaration of bankruptcy by the decree of the district court. This right, he cannot exercise after the expiration of two years. Such was the decision of this court in Comegys v. McCord, 11 Ala. Rep. 932. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. The plaintiff shows he has forfeited his right, by failing to sue within two years.

¶2Let the judgment he affirmed.

/13/ala/388 · .json · Public domain