Weinstein v. Citizens Bank’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1930
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on German-American National Bank v. Lewis · B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. Nicholas · Tabor v. Peters · Alabama National Bank v. Halsey · Troup v. Morgan County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If, as a matter of fact, Weinstein Bros, was a partnership composed of L. Weinstein and E. Weinstein, and it was the purpose of the plaintiff to sue so as to subject the individual property of the partners, as well as the firm property, the suit should be against L. Weinstein and E. Wpinstein, partners in business trading under the name of Weinstein Bros.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.