Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 ARIZ 120 - Tevis v. Ryan

Tevis v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1980 · most notably City of Glendale v. Coquat (1935), White v. Mechanics Securities Corp. (1925)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

15019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Globe Refining Company v. Landa Cotton Oil Company · Kennon v. Gilmer · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Ross · O'Brien v. Miller · Chicago St Ry Co v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is an abundance of authority, and it is a familiar rule of appellate practice, that a party will not be permitted on appeal to abandon the theory of a case to which he has assented upon the trial and substitute another. The reason of the rule is to be found in the injustice of permitting a case, tried and determined on assumptions adopted and acquiesced in as proper by both parties and followed by the court, to be retried upon appeal without regard thereto. In the trial of a cause, the admissions of counsel are constantly received and acted upon. In fact, as bearing upon the issue involved, admissions of counsel may be the ground of the court’s procedure equally as if established by the clearest proof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.