¶1In this case the justices sitting are equally divided upon the question of whether the trial court erred in rendering judgment for the appellees. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, without a discussion of the assignments of errors made by appellants.
13 Ariz. 135
Daggs v. Daggs
Decided April 2, 1910
Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1910-04-02
<p>Appeal and Error — Affirmance by Divided Court. — A judgment will be affirmed on appeal, on equal division of the court.</p>
Affirmed · Decided 1910-04-02