Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 ARIZ 155 - Luke v. Smith

Luke v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2010

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

6019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. Doran · White v. McGregor · Paris Grocer Co. v. W.H. Burks · Crumlish v. Railroad Co. · Blankenship v. Douglas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Where one has notice of a fact affecting property which he seeks to purchase, which puts him upon inquiry, he is chargeable with the knowledge which the inquiry, if made, would have revealed; and one is put upon inquiry by notice of a claim which is inconsistent with the title he seeks to obtain, and must exercise due diligence to ascertain the facts upon which the claim is based.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““‘Counsel agree that the statute was adopted from the laws of Texas by the Legislature of this territory. The Supreme Court of that state, while uniformly holding that a prior unrecorded conveyance or mortgage creates no rights as against creditors who have obtained liens, had, prior to our adoption of the statute, construed it as not affecting resulting trusts or equitable liens evidence of which is not required or permitted to be recorded. * * ” [ 13 Ariz. 155 , 108 P. 495 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.