13 Ariz. App. 261 - Moore v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1970
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 27 Cal. 2d 335 - Milana v. Credit Discount Co. · Britz v. Kinsvater · Seargeant v. Smith · Blaisdell v. Steinfeld · 14 Utah 2d 111 - Hallstrom v. Buhler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No person shall directly or indirectly take or receive in money, goods, or things in action, or in any other way, any greater sum or any greater value for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or things in action, than eight dollars on one hundred dollars for one year. Any person, contracting for, reserving or receiving, directly or indirectly, any greater sum or value, shall forfeit all interest.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.