Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ariz. App. 332 - Garrett v. Shannon

13 Ariz. App. 332 - Garrett v. Shannon’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Selby v. Savard (1982), Johnson v. Johnson (1981)

2 district · 26 state decisions

12019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rundle v. Winters · Cosper v. the Valley Bank · Donato v. Fishburn · McFadden v. Watson · Fox v. Weissbach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In situations involving a contract debt or other contractual obligation, it is well established by many Arizona decisions that if such debt or contractual obligation was incurred during coverture, it is presumed to be a community debt.” Garrett v. Shannon, 13 Ariz.App. 332, 333 , 476 P.2d 538, 539 (1970).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The law is settled in Arizona that the community property of both spouses may be liable for an intentional tort committed by one of the spouses where the intent and purpose of the activity leading to the commission of the tort was to benefit the community interests. Rodgers v. Bryan, 82 Ariz. 143 , 309 P.2d 773 (1957); and McFadden v. Watson, 51 Ariz. 110 , 74 P.2d 1181 (1938).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.