13 Ariz. App. 571 - Pinal County v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably 17 Ariz. App. 428 - Transcon Lines v. Barnes (1972), 22 Ariz. App. 76 - Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court (1974)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Busy Bee Buffet, Inc. v. Ferrell · Blakely Oil, Inc. v. Crowder · 9 Ariz. App. 406 - Riexinger v. Ashton Company · 5 Ariz. App. 299 - Thornton v. Marsico · 10 Ariz. App. 189 - City of Phoenix v. Whiting
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the cases interpreting Busy Bee, the Arizona Appellate Courts have held that there is no indemnity between joint tort-feasors enabling the one who is less negligent to get indemnity from the other for damages caused by the concurring negligent acts of both. Busy Bee and Crouse only permit indemnity when the party seeking indemnity was not personally at fault and did not actively participate in the wrong causing injury to a third party, but was nevertheless liable because of a legal duty to the third party for the conduct of the indemnitor who actively caused the injury.” (Citations omitted)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““F. the indemnitee, a retailer or user of a chattel which is dangerously defective for its intended use because of the fault of the supplier and/or manufacturer-indemnitor, becomes liable to another; ..."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.