Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Bedell 57 - People v. . Stedeker

People v. . Stedeker’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
4
states following
September 1973
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently September 1973 · most notably Albert Adams v. People of the State of New York (1904), Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. Golden (1964)

65 state decisions

13019031910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilton v. . Beecher · Harris v. . White · Fleming v. . the People · 5 E.H. Smith 60 - Rowell v. . Janvrin · The People v. . Buddensieck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ There has always been observed a distinction between betting or gambling and maintaining a gambling-house or a place to which people resort to gamble. While at common law wagers on indifferent subjects were legal and might be enforced, a gambling-house or a resort for gamblers was a public nuisance for which its keeper might be indicted (Wharton’s 'Criminal Law, § 2, 446). “ The same distinction has obtained in this State, where ordinary betting has never been made a crime, though in some cases subject to small pecuniary mulcts, while the keeping of a gambling-house, selling lottery tickets and the profession of a common gambler have been subjected to severe punishment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.