Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 B.R. 342 - In Re Johnson

In Re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2019

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

701981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 301

Relies on 53 F. Supp. 301 - Lockhart v. Mercer Tube & Mfg. Co. · Brummer v. Perras, Fafard, Gagnon Inc. (In Re Centre De Tricots De Gaspe, Ltee.)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determine whether or not the court must dismiss the case. They are factual or legal questions which the court must determine. They are the issues raised by the pleadings. They are defenses not jurisdictional requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the district court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all cases under title 11.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.