Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 BTA 1133 - Mathews v. Commissioner

Mathews v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 1936
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Standard Oil Company v. Edward Anderson · Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell · Casement v. Brown · Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Rahn · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts in the instant case are substantially different from those in Metcalf & Eddy case, supra. Here the services rendered by the petitioner for the Department of Public Service were at all times subject to the control of the Board of Public Commissioners and the City Attorney. The latter’s name appeared on all the pleadings filed by the petitioner on behalf of the city and its subdivisions. The petitioner’s employment was continuous and his compensation was on a definite monthly basis. He devoted practically no time to other matters. His office space, supplies and necessary help were all furnished him by the city. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Any taxes imposed by the Revenue Act of 1924 or prior revenue Acts upon any individual in respect of amounts received by him as compensation for personal services as an officer or employee of any State- or political subdivision thereof (except to the extent that such compensation is paid by the United States Government directly or indirectly), shall, subject to the statutory period of limitations properly applicable thereto, be abated, credited, or refunded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.