Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Cal. 170

Fee v. Starr

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859

California Supreme Court · decided 1859-07-01

<p>Appeal from the Fifth District.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1887

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Terry, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

¶1Baldwin, J. concurring.

¶2There is in the record no properly authenticated statement or bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence.

¶3The statement in the record is neither signed by the Judge, nor agreed to by the parties, nor does it appear that a copy was ever served on Respondent or his Attorney.

¶4*171The Clerk’s certificate that the statement is the same which was used on the argument of the motion for a new trial, is entitled to no weight, as the Clerk is not authorized by law to verify a statement in that form.

¶5The judgment roll disclosing no irregularities, the judgment is affirmed.

/13/cal/170 · .json · Public domain