Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 CAL 87 - Baker v. Baker

Baker v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1859

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018 · most notably Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. (1932), 2 Cal. 3d 619 - Keeler v. Superior Court (1970)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions — followed in 20 states

9018591860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute, as appears, does not in terms prohibit the introduction of confessions; but only provides that the decree shall not be granted on them. In this respect it is only affirmatory of the well-established rule of the common and of the English ecclesiastical law, which has been recognized from the earliest period, both in England and the several states of the Union. The object of the rule is to prevent collusion between the parties. Without some limitation of this kind, it would be in the power of the parties to obtain a divorce in all cases. The public is interested in the marriage relation and the maintenance of its integrity; as it is the' foundation of the social system, and the law wisely requires proof of the facts alleged as the ground for its dissolution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to the rules1 of-the-common law*in cases-of'-that naturey* for-statutes1 are not-presumed to make any alterations in the common law, further or other wise than”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.