13 Cal. 3d 663 - People v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 190 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “effectively suppl[ied] to a defendant those skills and legal knowledge which we can reasonably expect from any member of the bar.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 23 Cal. 3d 412 - People v. Pope · 171 Cal. App. 4th 1219 - In Re E.S.

2. “In People v. Dumas (1973) 9 Cal.3d 871 [ 109 Cal. Rptr. 304 , 512 P.2d 1208 ], we stated that officers are empowered under the Carroll [ Carroll v. United States (1925) 267 U.S. 132 ( 69 L.Ed. 543 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 39 A.L.R. 790 )] doctrine to search an automobile as `long as it can be demonstrated that (1) exigent circumstances rendered the obtaining of a warrant an impossible or impractical alternative, and (2) probable cause existed for the search.' ( Id., at p. 884, see also concurring opn. by Sullivan, J., at p. 886, fn. 1; see also Chambers v. Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42, 52 [ 26 L.Ed.2d 419, 428-429 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 ]; People v. Laursen (1972) 8 Cal.3d 192, 201 [ 104 Cal. Rptr. 425 , 501 P.2d 1145 ].)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 16 Cal. 3d 557 - Wimberly v. Superior Court

3. “the scope of a permissible search where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains contraband is not limited by the rules circumscribing the scope of a search incident to a contemporaneous arrest.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 16 Cal. 3d 557 - Wimberly v. Superior Court