Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Cal. 3d 757 - White v. Davis

13 Cal. 3d 757 - White v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

665
cited by 665 later decisions
7
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 district · 620 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 665 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988), 7 Cal. 4th 1 - Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. (1994)

12 federal appellate · 3 district · 620 state decisions

313019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griswold v. State of Connecticut · United States v. O'Brien · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY · Shelton v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 665 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'mischiefs' " that the Privacy Initiative addressed were: "(1) 'government snooping' and the secret gathering of personal information; (2) the overbroad collection and retention of unnecessary personal information by government and business interests; (3) the improper use of information properly obtained for a specific purpose, for example, the use of it for another purpose or the disclosure of it to some third party; and (4) the lack of a reasonable check on the accuracy of existing * records.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “does not purport to prohibit all incursion into individual privacy but rather [requires] that any such intervention must be justified by a compelling interest.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “‘The right of privacy is the right to be left alone. It is a fundamental and compelling interest. It protects our homes, our families, our thoughts, our emotions, our expressions, our personalities, our freedom of communion and our freedom to associate with the people we choose.’”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.