People v. Panizzon’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
314 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 321 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably 22 Cal. 4th 290 - People v. Hester (2000), 19 Cal. 4th 550 - People v. Massie (1998)
314 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Brady v. United States · 1 Cal. 3d 122 - In Re Tahl · 34 Cal. 3d 441 - People v. Dillon · 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 321 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[i]n determining whether section 1237.5 applies to a challenge of a sentence imposed after a plea of guilty or no contest, courts must look to the substance of the appeal: "the crucial issue is what the defendant is challenging, not the time or manner in which the challenge is made.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“[that] is outside the defendant's contemplation and knowledge at the time the waiver is made.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“Notwithstanding the broad language of section 1237.5, it is settled that two types of issues may be raised in a guilty or nolo contendere plea appeal without issuance of a certificate: (1) search and seizure issues for which an appeal is provided under section 1538.5, subdivision (m); and (2) issues regarding proceedings held subsequent to the plea for the purpose of determining the degree of the crime and the penalty to be imposed. [Citations.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.