Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Cal. App. 299

109 P 1112

People v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1910

California Court of Appeal · decided 1910-04-25

<p>Criminal Law—Forgery—Absence of Argument for Appellant.— Upon appeal from a conviction for forgery, where no further proceeding appears to have been taken by appellant since the taking of the appeal, and an examination of the record shows that no reason exists for an interference with the action of the trial court, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed.</p>

Decided 1910-04-25

BURNETT, J.

¶1The defendant was convicted of forgery and sentenced to the penitentiary for the period of five years. A motion for a new trial was made and denied and a notice of appeal from this order and also from the judgment was given as provided by section 1239 of the Penal Code. No further proceeding seems to have been taken by appellant, probably for the reason that his counsel were satisfied after deliberation that no error was committed during the trial that would justify a reversal of the judgment. At any rate, an examination of the record convinces us that no reason exists for an interference with the action of the trial court, and the judgment and the order are affirmed.

¶2Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J:, concurred.

/13/calapp/299 · .json · Public domain