Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Cal. App. 735

In re Osborne

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1910

California Court of Appeal · decided 1910-07-06

<p>APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to the sheriff of Napa County.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>

Relies on 3 Cal. App. 237 - Ex Parte Sauer

Decided 1910-07-06

THE COURT.

¶1The court is unable to concur in a judgment either for remanding the prisoner or discharging him, and, under article VI, section 4, of the constitution, and upon the authority of Ex parte Oates, 2 Cal. App. xiii, [83 Pac. 261], and Ex parte Sauer, 3 Cal. App. 237, [84 Pac. 995], the writ must be regarded as'denied, and it is so ordered.

¶2It is further ordered, that upon the return of the prisoner to the custody of the sheriff, or upon his resumption of the custody of the prisoner, the order for bail pending the proceedings be discharged, and, if money was deposited by him in lieu of bail, that it be returned to him by the clerk of the court.

/13/calapp/735 · .json · Public domain