Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 CALAPP2D 435 - Bartlett v. Jackson

Bartlett v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1987

10 state decisions

50193619401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 43 Cal. App. 416 - Helme v. Great Western Milling Co. · Norton v. Puter · 111 Cal. App. 13 - Malone v. Clemow · Harrison v. Formby · 136 Cal. App. 272 - Nichols v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Wilful misconduct depends upon the facts of a particular case, and necessarily involves deliberate, intentional, or wanton conduct in doing or omitting to perform acts, with knowledge or appreciation of the fact, on the part of the culpable person, that danger is likely to result therefrom. ’ “We are cited to no authority in this state which holds that a complaint which is based on wilful misconduct, and which merely alleges in general language that the defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct in the operation of his automobile, without reciting any specific facts upon which that charge is based is sufficient as against a special demurrer. In the case of Helme v. Western Milling Co., 43 Cal.App. 416 [ 185 P. 510 ], it is said: “ ‘ “Wilful misconduct” means something different from and more than negligence, however gross. . . .’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.