Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 CALAPP2D 440 - Nicholls v. Anders

Nicholls v. Anders’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 1961
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 1961

16 state decisions

801936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Taaffe · Waite v. Southern Pacific Co. · Jergins v. Schenck · Madison v. Octave Oil Co. · 131 Cal. App. 317 - Minehan v. Silveria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any doubt that may exist should be resolved in favor of the application [to vacate the judgment], to the end of securing a trial upon the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.