Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Cal. App. 2d 659

Favalora v. Oden

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1936

California Court of Appeal · decided 1936-05-06

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-05-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1960

6 state decisions

201936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOURSE, P. J.

¶1 Plaintiffs sued for damages for the death of their child aged four years and eight months. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Findings were made that defendants were not negligent and that plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence. The appeal is confined to an attack on these findings.

¶2 The defendant Oden was operating a truck in the delivery of milk. While the truck was stopped at the curb of the left or “wrong” side of the intersection of two streets, the little child entered the street and ran or “toddled” across the intersection and then along the right-hand side of the truck to a point immediately in front of it. At that moment the truck was started, and the child was struck down and killed. The evidence was that the child could not have been seen by the defendant and that the latter had exercised all *660 the care and caution that could be demanded of anyone operating the truck. The evidence furthermore demonstrated the contributory negligence of the parents in permitting the child to play in the street in spite of previous perils and of warnings of the danger.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

/13/calapp2d/659 · .json · Public domain