13 Cal. App. 4th 816 - Dolan v. Borelli’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2014
5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 44 Cal. 3d 1103 - Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. · AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank · 18 Cal. 3d 93 - Sanchez v. South Hoover Hospital · 39 Cal. 3d 892 - Gutierrez v. Mofid · 152 Cal. App. 3d 753 - Hills v. Aronsohn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he essential inquiry is when did [Tilley] suspect [PG & E] was negligent, not when did [he] learn precisely how [PG & E] was negligent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the negligent cause of her injury until more than three years after she first experiences harm from the injury, she will not be able to bring a malpractice action.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. No. 92-56393“the Jolly analysis applies to section 340.5”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.