Farms v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2015
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 31 U.S.C. § 3728 · 41 U.S.C. § 601 (Contract Disputes Act of 1978)
Relies on United States v. Testan · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. King · Eastport Steamship Corp. v. United States · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It appears that the listing in the Claims Control Record as well as the withholding of due payments were related to the main cause of action in these cases. Since the court found [that Doko Farms] were not liable for the alleged overpayments, there appears to be no legal basis for the retention of monies due [Doko].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.