LaBow v. LaBow’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
109 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Darak v. Darak (1989), Lo Sacco v. Young (1989)
109 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Richardson v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Pasquariello v. Pasquariello · Sanchione v. Sanchione
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The controlling standard is whether a reasonable person who is aware of all the circumstances surrounding the judicial proceeding would question the judge's impartiality.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is axiomatic that a trial judge must conduct all trial proceedings with the `highest degree of impartiality.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“has over the years employed a large variety of names and devices to obscure his assets”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.