Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.2d 299 - Cush v. Allen

Cush v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.2d 299 · 1926

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2015

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

401926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hobbs v. McLean · Stucky v. Masonic Savings Bank · Potter v. National Bank · Merriman v. Wickersham · Monongahela National Bank v. Jacobus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “testify by its officers and directors.” (quoting N.J. Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 58 N.J.L. 196 , 33 A. 475, 475 (E. & A. 1895))); Villaje Del Rio, Ltd. v. Colina Del Rio, LP, 2009 WL 1606431 , at (W.D.Tex. June 8, 2009) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.