Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.3d 1043 - United States v. Holiusa

United States v. Holiusa’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.3d 1043 · 1994

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
October 2009
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Righetti · Soto v. United States · Holder v. Hall · United States v. Kopp · United States v. Schneider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The] meaning of 'loss' ... is a question of law that is subject to de novo review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “amount of the loan not repaid at the time the offense is discovered, reduced by the amount the lending institution has recovered, or can expect to recover, from any assets pledged to secure the loan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unrealized plans to repay do not reduce the loss amount”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.