Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.3d 1126 - United States v. Hamm

United States v. Hamm’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.3d 1126 · 1994

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

38 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1994), United States v. Hatchett (1994)

38 federal appellate ·

350199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Fussell v. Price · Luster v. Cushman · Moody v. Smith · United States v. Muhammad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “committing, suborning, or attempting to suborn perjury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “should be 'especially disinclined to conclude on the basis of a cold record that the court committed clear error.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.